Model comparison
GLM-4.6 vs o1-pro
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.6 #85 (Supported); o1-pro #141 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GLM-4.6 and o1-pro share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to GLM-4.6; 1 to o1-pro.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- GLM-4.6 only
- 13
- o1-pro only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GLM-4.6 and o1-pro is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GLM-4.6 | Δ | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | GLM-4.6Not measured | MarginNo overlap | o1-pro79.0 |
| Math | GLM-4.63.4 | MarginNo overlap | o1-proNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GLM-4.6 | o1-pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GLM-4.6Not available | o1-pro$150 input / $600 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GLM-4.6Not available | o1-proNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GLM-4.6Not available | o1-proNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GLM-4.6200K | o1-pro200K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 76.9% | — | Not comparable |
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 23.0% | 18.9% | GLM-4.6 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 63.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 5.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -31.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 20.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 66.1% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 79% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 36.7% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GLM-4.6 and o1-pro on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GLM-4.6 and o1-pro today?
o1-pro: $150.00 input / $600.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.