Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mistral Large 3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
50.4/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7-Flash #106 (Supported); Mistral Large 3 #113 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.7-Flash and Mistral Large 3 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GLM-4.7-Flash; 16 to Mistral Large 3.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
GLM-4.7-Flash only
0
Mistral Large 3 only
16
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.7-Flash and Mistral Large 3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GLM-4.7-Flash yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Mistral Large 3 is priced at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7-Flash. GLM-4.7-Flash has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 3.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.7-FlashMistral Large 3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.7-Flash$0 input / $0 outputMistral Large 3$0.5 input / $1.5 outputGLM-4.7-Flash has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.7-Flash95 tok/sMistral Large 348 tok/sGLM-4.7-Flash has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.7-Flash0.91 sMistral Large 31.04 sGLM-4.7-Flash reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.7-Flash200KMistral Large 3128KGLM-4.7-Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashMistral Large 3Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 5.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 24.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 6.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 633Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashMistral Large 3Result
AA Coding IndexSource 20.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 36.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashMistral Large 3Result
AA-LCRSource 34.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashMistral Large 3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 15.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 68.0%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -39.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.7%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashMistral Large 3Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 55.7%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashMistral Large 3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 36.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.7-Flash and Mistral Large 3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.7-Flash and Mistral Large 3 today?

GLM-4.7-Flash: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 3: $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-4.7-Flash
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Large 3
API / mo$1,500
Self-host / mo$9,110
Break-even380M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.