GLM-4.7 vs o3
Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
GLM-4.7 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
GLM-4.7
63
o3
54
Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #34 · o3 unranked
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3 only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Δ | o3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Math | 1.8 | → 12.7 | 14.5 |
| Agentic | 45.7 | — | — |
| Coding | 73.8 | — | — |
| Knowledge | 52.1 | — | — |
Operational Comparison
GLM-4.7
o3
$0 / $0
$2 / $8
82 t/s
118 t/s
1.10s
5.38s
200K
200K
Quick Verdict
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3 only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.
GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 63 to 54. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
o3 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, GLM-4.7 or o3?
GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 63 to 54. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), where the scores are 2.439% and 18.685%.
Which is better for math, GLM-4.7 or o3?
o3 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 14.5 versus 1.8. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.