GLM-4.7 vs Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
GLM-4.7
63
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
69
Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #34 · Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) unranked
Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Δ | Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | 52.1 | → 21.8 | 73.9 |
| Agentic | 45.7 | → 19.7 | 65.4 |
| Coding | 73.8 | ← 19.3 | 54.5 |
| Math | 1.8 | → 16.6 | 18.4 |
Operational Comparison
GLM-4.7
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
$0 / $0
N/A
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
N/A
200K
256K
Quick Verdict
Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 63. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)'s sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 73.9 against 52.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 65.4%. GLM-4.7 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (5)
Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 63. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 65.4%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.9 versus 52.1. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?
GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.8 versus 54.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for math, GLM-4.7 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 18.4 versus 1.8. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.4 versus 45.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.