Skip to main content

GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.1

83

VS

Qwen3.6 Plus

73

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.1 #21 · Qwen3.6 Plus #10

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6 Plus only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GLM-5.1
65.3vs61.6

+3.7 difference

Coding

Qwen3.6 Plus
60.9vs64.8

+3.9 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.6 Plus
52.3vs66

+13.7 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.1

Qwen3.6 Plus

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$null / $null

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

203K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6 Plus only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

GLM-5.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 73. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.1's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.3 against 61.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 52.3% to 28.8%. Qwen3.6 Plus does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.6 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 203K for GLM-5.1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

GLM-5.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 73. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 52.3% and 28.8%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66 versus 52.3. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.8 versus 60.9. Inside this category, Vibe Code Bench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.3 versus 61.6. Inside this category, MCP Atlas is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
Qwen3.6 Plus
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 13, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.