Skip to main content

GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.4 Pro

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.2

94

VS

GPT-5.4 Pro

90

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.2 #9 · GPT-5.4 Pro unranked

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 Pro only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1.05M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GPT-5.4 Pro
81vs89.3

+8.3 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5.2
67.2vs49

+18.2 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.2

GPT-5.4 Pro

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$30 / $180

Speed

N/A

74 t/s

Latency (first answer)

N/A

151.79s

Context Window

1M

1.05M

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 Pro only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1.05M context window.

GLM-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 94 to 90. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 67.2 against 49. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 54.7% to 58.7%. GPT-5.4 Pro does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.4 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens for GLM-5.2. That is roughly 40.9x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 1M for GLM-5.2.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.4 Pro?

GLM-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 94 to 90. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 54.7% and 58.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.4 Pro?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.2 versus 49. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.3 versus 81. GLM-5.2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.