Skip to main content

GLM-5.2 vs Hy3 Preview

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.2

94

VS

Hy3 Preview

58

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.2 #9 · Hy3 Preview unranked

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Hy3 Preview only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GLM-5.2
81vs54.4

+26.6 difference

Coding

GLM-5.2
62.1vs60

+2.1 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5.2
67.2vs46.7

+20.5 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.2

Hy3 Preview

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Hy3 Preview only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

GLM-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 94 to 58. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.2's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 81 against 54.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 54.7% to 25.5%.

GLM-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Hy3 Preview. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GLM-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Hy3 Preview.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5.2 or Hy3 Preview?

GLM-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 94 to 58. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 54.7% and 25.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.2 or Hy3 Preview?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.2 versus 46.7. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or Hy3 Preview?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 60. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.2 or Hy3 Preview?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 54.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.