Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GLM-5.2
94
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
63
Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.2 #9 · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #14
Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Agentic
+24.9 difference
Coding
+9.9 difference
Knowledge
+14.4 difference
GLM-5.2
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
$1.4 / $4.4
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
262K
Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
GLM-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 94 to 63. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-5.2's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 81 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 81% to 49.4%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
GLM-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GLM-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
GLM-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 94 to 63. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 81% and 49.4%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 67.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 62.1. GLM-5.2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
GLM-5.2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.