Skip to main content

GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.2

94

VS

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

78

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.2 #9 · Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) unranked

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GLM-5.2
81vs65.4

+15.6 difference

Coding

GLM-5.2
62.1vs54.1

+8.0 difference

Knowledge

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
67.2vs73.9

+6.7 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.2

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

GLM-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 94 to 78. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.2's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 81 against 65.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 81% to 65.4%. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Qwen 3.6 Max (preview).

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

GLM-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 94 to 78. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 81% and 65.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.9 versus 67.2. GLM-5.2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 54.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 65.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.