Skip to main content

GLM-5 vs GPT-5.4

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5

67

VS

GPT-5.4

89

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5 #21 · GPT-5.4 #16

Pick GPT-5.4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GPT-5.4
56.2vs77

+20.8 difference

Coding

GLM-5
63.2vs57.7

+5.5 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5
70.7vs66.1

+4.6 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5

GPT-5.4

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1 / $3.2

$2.5 / $15

Speed

74 t/s

74 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

1.64s

151.79s

Context Window

200K

1.05M

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.4 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 89 to 67. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.4's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 77 against 56.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 56.2% to 75.1%. GLM-5 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.4 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens for GLM-5. That is roughly 4.7x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 is the reasoning model in the pair, while GLM-5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.4 gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 200K for GLM-5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5 or GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 89 to 67. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 56.2% and 75.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5 or GPT-5.4?

GLM-5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.7 versus 66.1. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5 or GPT-5.4?

GLM-5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 63.2 versus 57.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5 or GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77 versus 56.2. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.