Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Grok 4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 7 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.14/100
Margin
18.4pts
winning →
59.52/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 nano #170 (Estimated); Grok 4 #54 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 nano and Grok 4 share 13 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to GPT-4.1 nano; 3 to Grok 4.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
13
GPT-4.1 nano only
8
Grok 4 only
3
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Grok 4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 nano only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 7 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Grok 4 is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 59.52 to 41.14. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Grok 4's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 15.3 against 1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), 1.034% to 19.655%.

GPT-4.1 nano gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Grok 4.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4.1 nano and Grok 4
CategoryGPT-4.1 nanoΔGrok 4
MathGPT-4.1 nano1.0Margin 14.3Grok 415.3
KnowledgeGPT-4.1 nano50.3MarginNo overlapGrok 4Not measured
Inst. FollowingGPT-4.1 nano83.2MarginNo overlapGrok 4Not measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GPT-4.1 nanoB · Grok 4
  1. FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 1.034%B 19.655%
    Winner: Grok 4Δ 18.6
    FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): GPT-4.1 nano scored 1.034%; Grok 4 scored 19.655%. Grok 4 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoGrok 4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputGrok 4Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sGrok 454 tok/sGPT-4.1 nano has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sGrok 415.60 sGPT-4.1 nano reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.1 nano1MGrok 4128KGPT-4.1 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok 4Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%74.9%Grok 4 leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 63Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 42.34%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok 4Result
AA Coding IndexSource 11.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 25.9%45.7%Grok 4 leads
React Native EvalsSource 72.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok 4Result
AA-LCRSource 17.0%68.0%Grok 4 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%2.0%Grok 4 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok 4Result
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.6%33.3%Grok 4 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.2%87.7%Grok 4 leads
AA-HLESource 3.9%23.9%Grok 4 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%3.8%Grok 4 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%41.4%Grok 4 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%64.2%Grok 4 leads
MathGrok 4 wins
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok 4Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%19.655%Grok 4 leads
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok 4Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 40.1%68.8%Grok 4 leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1003Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok 4Result
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%53.7%Grok 4 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GPT-4.1 nano or Grok 4?

Grok 4 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 59.52 to 41.14. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), where the scores are 1.034% and 19.655%.

Which is better for math, GPT-4.1 nano or Grok 4?

Grok 4 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 15.3 versus 1. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026