Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Mistral Large 3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.14/100
Margin
8.4pts
winning →
49.57/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 nano #170 (Estimated); Mistral Large 3 #118 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 nano and Mistral Large 3 share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to GPT-4.1 nano; 0 to Mistral Large 3.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
16
GPT-4.1 nano only
5
Mistral Large 3 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4.1 nano and Mistral Large 3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Mistral Large 3 is priced at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4.1 nano. GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4.1 nano and Mistral Large 3
CategoryGPT-4.1 nanoΔMistral Large 3
KnowledgeGPT-4.1 nano50.3MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured
MathGPT-4.1 nano1.0MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured
Inst. FollowingGPT-4.1 nano83.2MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Large 3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputMistral Large 3$0.5 input / $1.5 outputGPT-4.1 nano has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sMistral Large 348 tok/sGPT-4.1 nano has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sMistral Large 31.04 sGPT-4.1 nano reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.1 nano1MMistral Large 3128KGPT-4.1 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Large 3Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%5.5%Mistral Large 3 leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%24.6%Mistral Large 3 leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%7.0%Mistral Large 3 leads
GDPval-AASource 63640Mistral Large 3 leads
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Large 3Result
AA Coding IndexSource 11.1%20.1%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 25.9%36.2%Mistral Large 3 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Large 3Result
AA-LCRSource 17.0%34.7%Mistral Large 3 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Large 3Result
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.6%15.9%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.2%68.0%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-HLESource 3.9%4.1%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%-39.4%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%24.1%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%83.7%GPT-4.1 nano leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Large 3Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Large 3Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 40.1%55.7%Mistral Large 3 leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1003Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMistral Large 3Result
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%36.2%Mistral Large 3 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4.1 nano and Mistral Large 3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4.1 nano and Mistral Large 3 today?

GPT-4.1 nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 3: $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-4.1 nano
API / mo$375
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Large 3
API / mo$1,500
Self-host / mo$9,110
Break-even380M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026