Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 235B 2507

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

OpenAI
50.44/100
Margin
4.8pts
winning →
55.26/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 #111 (Supported); Qwen3 235B 2507 #84 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 235B 2507 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 19 results are unique to GPT-4.1; 3 to Qwen3 235B 2507.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
1
GPT-4.1 only
19
Qwen3 235B 2507 only
3
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Qwen3 235B 2507 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen3 235B 2507 is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 55.26 to 50.44. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3 235B 2507's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 78.9 against 66.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 66.3% to 77.5%.

GPT-4.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3 235B 2507. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-4.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Qwen3 235B 2507.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 235B 2507
CategoryGPT-4.1ΔQwen3 235B 2507
KnowledgeGPT-4.166.3Margin 12.6Qwen3 235B 250778.9
CodingGPT-4.154.6MarginNo overlapQwen3 235B 2507Not measured
MathGPT-4.14.1MarginNo overlapQwen3 235B 2507Not measured
MultilingualGPT-4.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3 235B 250779.4
Inst. FollowingGPT-4.187.4MarginNo overlapQwen3 235B 2507Not measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GPT-4.1B · Qwen3 235B 2507
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 66.3%B 77.5%
    Winner: Qwen3 235B 2507Δ 11.2
    GPQA: GPT-4.1 scored 66.3%; Qwen3 235B 2507 scored 77.5%. Qwen3 235B 2507 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1Qwen3 235B 2507Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1$2 input / $8 outputQwen3 235B 2507$0 input / $0 outputQwen3 235B 2507 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1108 tok/sQwen3 235B 2507Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.11.02 sQwen3 235B 2507Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.11MQwen3 235B 2507128KGPT-4.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 235B 2507Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 47.1%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 25.65%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 235B 2507Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 54.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 235B 2507Result
AA-LCRSource 61.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
KnowledgeQwen3 235B 2507 wins
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 235B 2507Result
MMLUSource 90.2%Not comparable
GPQASource 66.3%77.5%Qwen3 235B 2507 leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.4%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 66.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -36.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 79.6%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 62.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 83%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 235B 2507Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 5.517%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 235B 2507Result
MMLU-ProXSource 79.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 235B 2507Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 61.2%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1068Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 235B 2507Result
IFEvalSource 87.4%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 43.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Qwen3 235B 2507 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 55.26 to 50.44. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 66.3% and 77.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Qwen3 235B 2507 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.9 versus 66.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026