Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 vs Trinity-Large-Preview

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

OpenAI
51.11/100
Margin
4.8pts
winning →
55.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 #108 (Supported); Trinity-Large-Preview #79 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 and Trinity-Large-Preview share 13 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to GPT-4.1; 5 to Trinity-Large-Preview.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
13
GPT-4.1 only
7
Trinity-Large-Preview only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4.1 and Trinity-Large-Preview is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-4.1 is priced at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens for Trinity-Large-Preview. GPT-4.1 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 512K for Trinity-Large-Preview.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4.1 and Trinity-Large-Preview
CategoryGPT-4.1ΔTrinity-Large-Preview
CodingGPT-4.154.6MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
KnowledgeGPT-4.166.3MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
MathGPT-4.14.1MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
Inst. FollowingGPT-4.187.4MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1Trinity-Large-PreviewComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1$2 input / $8 outputTrinity-Large-Preview$0.25 input / $1 outputTrinity-Large-Preview has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1108 tok/sTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.11.02 sTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.11MTrinity-Large-Preview512KGPT-4.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 47.1%90.1%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Gert LabsSource 25.65%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 2.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 554Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 54.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.1%36.1%GPT-4.1 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-LCRSource 61.0%33.0%GPT-4.1 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.9%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
MMLUSource 90.2%87.2%GPT-4.1 leads
GPQASource 66.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.4%24.5%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 66.6%75.2%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-HLESource 4.6%14.7%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -36.2%-44.2%GPT-4.1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.2%22.8%GPT-4.1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 79.6%86.6%GPT-4.1 leads
MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source 75.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 63.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 5.517%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
AIME25 (Arcee)Source 24.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 61.2%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 10681165Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
IFEvalSource 87.4%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 43.0%56.3%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4.1 and Trinity-Large-Preview on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4.1 and Trinity-Large-Preview today?

GPT-4.1: $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens Trinity-Large-Preview: $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.