Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

27.44/100
Margin
23.8pts
winning →
51.25/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4 Turbo #188 (Supported); Grok 4.1 Fast #107 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4 Turbo and Grok 4.1 Fast share 3 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to GPT-4 Turbo; 10 to Grok 4.1 Fast.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
3
GPT-4 Turbo only
1
Grok 4.1 Fast only
10
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4 Turbo and Grok 4.1 Fast is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-4 Turbo is priced at $10.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok 4.1 Fast. Grok 4.1 Fast has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for GPT-4 Turbo.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4 TurboGrok 4.1 FastComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4 Turbo$10 input / $30 outputGrok 4.1 Fast$0.2 input / $0.5 outputGrok 4.1 Fast has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4 Turbo30 tok/sGrok 4.1 Fast138 tok/sGrok 4.1 Fast has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4 Turbo2.84 sGrok 4.1 Fast0.54 sGrok 4.1 Fast reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4 Turbo128KGrok 4.1 Fast1MGrok 4.1 Fast lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboGrok 4.1 FastResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 63.7%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 47.32%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboGrok 4.1 FastResult
AA Coding IndexSource 21.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 31.9%29.6%GPT-4 Turbo leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboGrok 4.1 FastResult
AA-LCRSource 22.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboGrok 4.1 FastResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 7.9%16.9%Grok 4.1 Fast leads
AA-HLESource 3.3%5.0%Grok 4.1 Fast leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 63.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -50.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboGrok 4.1 FastResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 48.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboGrok 4.1 FastResult
AA-IFBenchSource 36.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4 Turbo and Grok 4.1 Fast on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4 Turbo and Grok 4.1 Fast today?

GPT-4 Turbo: $10.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens Grok 4.1 Fast: $0.20 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.