Skip to main content

Model profile

Grok 4.1 Fast

xAIEstablishedReleased Nov 19, 2025
Data verified
Overall Score
51.25Public #107 of 200Verified #59 of 99
Arena Elo
1420
Eligible category ranks
0of 8
Price (1M tokens)
$0.2 in / $0.5 out
API pricing
Speed
138tok/s
Context
1M

Evidence coverage

13 of 321 tracked benchmarks are published. 1 is verified and 12 provisional. 6 of 8 categories are measured.

Updated July 20, 2026Methodology
Published / tracked
13 / 321
Verified
1
Provisional
12
Categories with evidence
6 / 8

Evidence by category

  • Agentic2 benchmarks
    Mixed evidence
  • Coding1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Reasoning2 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Knowledge6 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Math0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multilingual0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multimodal1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Inst. Following1 benchmark
    Reported
ProprietaryNon-Reasoning
Confidence:
Low
base

Grok 4.1 Fast ranks #107 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 51.25/100. It also ranks #59 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.

Grok 4.1 Fast is a proprietary model with a 1M token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.

Grok 4.1 Fast sits inside the Grok 4.1 Fast family alongside Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning). This profile currently has 13 of 321 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Peer position

Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.

Range 50.8751.47

  1. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
    Alibaba
    #10451.47
    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is #104 with a score of 51.47.
    Compare
  2. Mercury 2
    Inception
    #10551.28
    Mercury 2 is #105 with a score of 51.28.
    Compare
  3. GLM-4.7-Flash
    Z.AI
    #10651.25
    GLM-4.7-Flash is #106 with a score of 51.25.
    Compare
  4. Grok 4.1 FastCurrent model
    xAI
    #10751.25
    Grok 4.1 Fast is #107 with a score of 51.25.
  5. GPT-4.1
    OpenAI
    #10851.11
    GPT-4.1 is #108 with a score of 51.11.
    Compare
  6. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
    NVIDIA
    #10950.97
    Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is #109 with a score of 50.97.
    Compare
  7. Step 3.7 Flash
    StepFun
    #11050.87
    Step 3.7 Flash is #110 with a score of 50.87.
    Compare

Category percentile

More

Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.

No eligible category percentile is available from the published evidence yet.

Category evidence

Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticRank Not rankedWeight 22%2 benchmarksMixed sources71.0
CodingRank Not rankedWeight 20%1 benchmarkReported58.9
ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%2 benchmarksReported87.9
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%6 benchmarksReported55.9
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkReported87.8
Inst. FollowingRank Not rankedWeight 5%1 benchmarkReported79.7

Chatbot Arena performance

Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.

Chatbot Arena Elo, confidence interval, and vote count by evaluation view
ViewEloConfidence intervalVotes
Text Overall1420Not availableNot available

Benchmark Details

Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.

Agentic2 benchmarks
τ²-bench resultsReported

τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation

63.7%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Gert LabsBenchmark exact

Gert Labs Composite Game Benchmark

47.32%Display only
Source: Gert Labs rankingsProvenance: Gert Labs reports this composite leaderboard score in the public rankings API. BenchLM scales the source gscore from 0-1 to 0-100 and stores it as a display-only agentic benchmark.
Coding1 benchmark
AA-SciCodeReported

Artificial Analysis SciCode

29.6%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Reasoning2 benchmarks
AA-LCRReported

Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning

22.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
CritPtReported

Critical Physics Tasks

0.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Knowledge6 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexReported
16.9%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-GPQA DiamondReported

Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond

63.7%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-HLEReported

Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam

5.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience IndexReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index

-50.9%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience AccuracyReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy

17.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate

81.8%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Multimodal1 benchmark
AA-MMMU-ProReported

Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro

48.4%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Inst. Following1 benchmark
AA-IFBenchReported

Artificial Analysis IFBench

36.5%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.

Grok 4.1 Fast Family

Base entry

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Grok 4.1 Fast perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Grok 4.1 Fast has 13 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.

Is Grok 4.1 Fast good for knowledge and understanding?

Grok 4.1 Fast has visible benchmark coverage in knowledge and understanding, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Grok 4.1 Fast good for coding and programming?

Grok 4.1 Fast has visible benchmark coverage in coding and programming, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Grok 4.1 Fast good for reasoning and logic?

Grok 4.1 Fast has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Grok 4.1 Fast good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Grok 4.1 Fast has visible benchmark coverage in agentic tool use and computer tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Grok 4.1 Fast good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

Grok 4.1 Fast has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Grok 4.1 Fast good for instruction following?

Grok 4.1 Fast has visible benchmark coverage in instruction following, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Which sibling models are related to Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast belongs to the Grok 4.1 Fast family. Related variants on BenchLM include Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning).

Does Grok 4.1 Fast have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. Grok 4.1 Fast currently has 13 published benchmark scores out of the 321 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast has a published context window of 1M, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Last updated: July 20, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Choose with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.

Free. One email per week.