Model comparison
GPT-4 Turbo vs Grok Code Fast 1
Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4 Turbo #188 (Supported); Grok Code Fast 1 #180 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-4 Turbo and Grok Code Fast 1 share 3 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to GPT-4 Turbo; 9 to Grok Code Fast 1.
Updated July 20, 2026- Shared results
- 3
- GPT-4 Turbo only
- 1
- Grok Code Fast 1 only
- 9
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GPT-4 Turbo and Grok Code Fast 1 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
GPT-4 Turbo is priced at $10.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok Code Fast 1. Grok Code Fast 1 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for GPT-4 Turbo.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GPT-4 Turbo | Δ | Grok Code Fast 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | GPT-4 TurboNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Grok Code Fast 170.8 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-4 Turbo | Grok Code Fast 1 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-4 Turbo$10 input / $30 output | Grok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 output | Grok Code Fast 1 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-4 Turbo30 tok/s | Grok Code Fast 1172 tok/s | Grok Code Fast 1 has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-4 Turbo2.84 s | Grok Code Fast 12.81 s | Grok Code Fast 1 reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-4 Turbo128K | Grok Code Fast 1256K | Grok Code Fast 1 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Grok Code Fast 1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 75.7% | Not comparable |
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Grok Code Fast 1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 7.9% | 21.6% | Grok Code Fast 1 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 3.3% | 7.5% | Grok Code Fast 1 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 72.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -36.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 23.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 78.5% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Grok Code Fast 1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 41.4% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GPT-4 Turbo and Grok Code Fast 1 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GPT-4 Turbo and Grok Code Fast 1 today?
GPT-4 Turbo: $10.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.