Model comparison
GPT-4o mini vs Grok 4
Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4o mini #192 (Supported); Grok 4 #54 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-4o mini and Grok 4 share 6 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to GPT-4o mini; 10 to Grok 4.
Updated July 24, 2026- Shared results
- 6
- GPT-4o mini only
- 4
- Grok 4 only
- 10
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GPT-4o mini and Grok 4 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GPT-4o mini | Δ | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Math | GPT-4o miniNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Grok 415.3 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-4o mini | Grok 4 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-4o mini$0.15 input / $0.6 output | Grok 4Not available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-4o mini33 tok/s | Grok 454 tok/s | Grok 4 has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-4o mini3.16 s | Grok 415.60 s | GPT-4o mini reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-4o mini128K | Grok 4128K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic5 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Grok 4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 6.9% | 33.3% | Grok 4 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 42.6% | 87.7% | Grok 4 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 4.0% | 23.9% | Grok 4 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 3.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 41.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 64.2% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Grok 4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 41.5% | 68.8% | Grok 4 leads |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Grok 4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 31.0% | 53.7% | Grok 4 leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GPT-4o mini and Grok 4 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GPT-4o mini and Grok 4 today?
GPT-4o mini: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Grok 4: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.