Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs GPT-5.2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

54.48/100
Margin
4.0pts
winning →
OpenAI
58.43/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max #90 (Estimated); GPT-5.2 #64 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and GPT-5.2 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to GPT-5.1-Codex-Max; 16 to GPT-5.2.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
12
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max only
1
GPT-5.2 only
16
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and GPT-5.2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.2 is priced at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and GPT-5.2
CategoryGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxΔGPT-5.2
AgenticGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.255.7
CodingGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.270.6
ReasoningGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.252.9
KnowledgeGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.292.4
MathGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.235.2
MultimodalGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.280.4

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.1-Codex-Max$1.25 input / $10 outputGPT-5.2$1.75 input / $14 outputGPT-5.1-Codex-Max has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableGPT-5.273 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableGPT-5.2130.34 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.1-Codex-Max400KGPT-5.2400KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.2Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 83%84.8%GPT-5.2 leads
BrowseCompSource 65.8%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 47.3%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.54%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 34.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.2Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 22.17%53.50%GPT-5.2 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 40.2%52.1%GPT-5.2 leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 80%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 55.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.2Result
AA-LCRSource 67.3%72.7%GPT-5.2 leads
CritPtSource 5.7%11.6%GPT-5.2 leads
ARC-AGI-2Source 52.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 34.7%42.2%GPT-5.2 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.0%90.3%GPT-5.2 leads
AA-HLESource 23.4%35.4%GPT-5.2 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -6.0%-1.0%GPT-5.2 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.2%43.8%GPT-5.2 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 74.4%79.7%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
GPQASource 92.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.2Result
AA AIME 2025Source 99.0%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 40.700%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.800%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.2Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 72.5%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 79.5%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 83.0%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82.1%Not comparable
V*Source 75.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1227Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 70.0%75.4%GPT-5.2 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and GPT-5.2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and GPT-5.2 today?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-5.2: $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.