Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs Qwen3 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

54.48/100
Margin
6.3pts
← winning
Alibaba
48.16/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max #90 (Estimated); Qwen3 Max #128 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and Qwen3 Max share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to GPT-5.1-Codex-Max; 2 to Qwen3 Max.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max only
1
Qwen3 Max only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and Qwen3 Max is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3 Max has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxQwen3 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.1-Codex-Max$1.25 input / $10 outputQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.1-Codex-Max400KQwen3 Max1MQwen3 Max lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxQwen3 MaxResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 83%74.3%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Gert LabsSource 43.74%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxQwen3 MaxResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 22.17%3.51%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-SciCodeSource 40.2%38.3%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxQwen3 MaxResult
AA-LCRSource 67.3%46.7%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
CritPtSource 5.7%0.0%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxQwen3 MaxResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 34.7%24.0%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.0%76.4%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-HLESource 23.4%11.1%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -6.0%-43.1%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.2%24.4%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 74.4%89.4%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxQwen3 MaxResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 72.5%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1148Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxQwen3 MaxResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.0%44.1%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and Qwen3 Max on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and Qwen3 Max today?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.