Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.2

79

VS

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

78

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
55.2vs65.4

+10.2 difference

Coding

GPT-5.2
64.7vs54.1

+10.6 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.2
92.4vs73.9

+18.5 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.2

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.75 / $14

N/A

Speed

73 t/s

N/A

Latency (first answer)

130.34s

N/A

Context Window

400K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.

GPT-5.2 finishes one point ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 79 to 78. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.4 against 73.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 55.6% to 57.3%. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 256K for Qwen 3.6 Max (preview).

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 79 to 78. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 55.6% and 57.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.2 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 73.9. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.2 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.7 versus 54.1. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.2 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.4 versus 55.2. Inside this category, Tau2-Telecom is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 27, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.