Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark vs Nova Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
No comparison
Amazon
19.58/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark #79 (Estimated); Nova Pro #206 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark and Nova Pro share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark; 12 to Nova Pro.

Updated July 28, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark only
0
Nova Pro only
12
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark and Nova Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Nova Pro.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.3-Codex-SparkNova ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.3-Codex-SparkNot availableNova ProNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.3-Codex-SparkNot availableNova Pro141 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.3-Codex-SparkNot availableNova Pro0.81 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.3-Codex-Spark256KNova Pro128KGPT-5.3-Codex-Spark lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-Codex-SparkNova ProResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 14%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-Codex-SparkNova ProResult
AA-SciCodeSource 20.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-Codex-SparkNova ProResult
AA-LCRSource 19.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-Codex-SparkNova ProResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 7.7%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 49.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -47.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 77.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-Codex-SparkNova ProResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 44.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-Codex-SparkNova ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource 38.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark and Nova Pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark and Nova Pro today?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark: Pricing unavailable Nova Pro: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.