Skip to main content

GPT-5.4 mini vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.4 mini

71

VS

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

65

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 mini unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #8

Pick GPT-5.4 mini if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GPT-5.4 mini
65.6vs56.1

+9.5 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
57.4vs81.6

+24.2 difference

Multimodal

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
76.6vs77.2

+0.6 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.4 mini

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.75 / $4.5

$0 / $0

Speed

201 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

3.85s

N/A

Context Window

400K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.4 mini if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.4 mini is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 71 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.4 mini's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.6 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 72.1% to 58%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.4 mini is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.75 input / $4.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 mini gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

GPT-5.4 mini is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 71 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 72.1% and 58%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 57.4. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

GPT-5.4 mini has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.6 versus 56.1. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 76.6. GPT-5.4 mini stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 13, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.