Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

60.02/100
Margin
6.0pts
← winning
Moonshot AI
54.03/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 Pro #48 (Estimated); Kimi K2.7 Code #92 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.4 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to GPT-5.4 Pro; 22 to Kimi K2.7 Code.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
1
GPT-5.4 Pro only
11
Kimi K2.7 Code only
22
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.4 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.4 Pro is priced at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.7 Code. GPT-5.4 Pro has the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.7 Code.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.4 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
CategoryGPT-5.4 ProΔKimi K2.7 Code
AgenticGPT-5.4 Pro89.3MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured
ReasoningGPT-5.4 Pro83.3MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured
KnowledgeGPT-5.4 Pro58.7MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured
MathGPT-5.4 Pro46.9MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured
MultimodalGPT-5.4 Pro94.0MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.4 ProKimi K2.7 CodeComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.4 Pro$30 input / $180 outputKimi K2.7 Code$0.95 input / $4 outputKimi K2.7 Code has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.4 Pro74 tok/sKimi K2.7 CodeNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.4 Pro151.79 sKimi K2.7 CodeNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.4 Pro1.05MKimi K2.7 Code256KGPT-5.4 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
BrowseCompSource 89.3%Not comparable
Kimi Claw 24/7Source 46.9%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 76%Not comparable
MCP Mark VerifiedSource 81.1%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 29.6%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 90.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 34.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1186Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
Kimi Code Bench v2Source 62.0%Not comparable
ProgramBenchSource 53.6%Not comparable
MLS-Bench LiteSource 35.1%Not comparable
cursorBench32Source 49.7%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 60.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 47.5%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 83.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 30.0%10.0%GPT-5.4 Pro leads
AA-LCRSource 66.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
HLESource 58.7%Not comparable
FrontierScienceSource 36.7%Not comparable
FrontierScience ResearchSource 36.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.7%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 42.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 32.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 38.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
IPhO 2025 (Theory)Source 93.5%Not comparable
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 50%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 50.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 37.500%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
MMMU-ProSource 94%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1300Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
AA-IFBenchSource 63.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.4 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.4 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code today?

GPT-5.4 Pro: $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens Kimi K2.7 Code: $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-5.4 Pro
API / mo$157,500
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Kimi K2.7 Code
API / mo$3,713
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even326M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.