Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Trinity-Large-Preview

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

60.89/100
Margin
5.0pts
← winning
55.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 Pro #44 (Estimated); Trinity-Large-Preview #79 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.4 Pro and Trinity-Large-Preview share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to GPT-5.4 Pro; 17 to Trinity-Large-Preview.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
1
GPT-5.4 Pro only
11
Trinity-Large-Preview only
17
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.4 Pro and Trinity-Large-Preview is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.4 Pro is priced at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens for Trinity-Large-Preview. GPT-5.4 Pro has the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 512K for Trinity-Large-Preview.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.4 Pro and Trinity-Large-Preview
CategoryGPT-5.4 ProΔTrinity-Large-Preview
AgenticGPT-5.4 Pro89.3MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
ReasoningGPT-5.4 Pro83.3MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
KnowledgeGPT-5.4 Pro58.7MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
MathGPT-5.4 Pro46.9MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
MultimodalGPT-5.4 Pro94.0MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.4 ProTrinity-Large-PreviewComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.4 Pro$30 input / $180 outputTrinity-Large-Preview$0.25 input / $1 outputTrinity-Large-Preview has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.4 Pro74 tok/sTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.4 Pro151.79 sTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.4 Pro1.05MTrinity-Large-Preview512KGPT-5.4 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
BrowseCompSource 89.3%—Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —90.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —2.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —554Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-SciCodeSource —36.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 83.3%—Not comparable
CritPtSource 30.0%0.9%GPT-5.4 Pro leads
AA-LCRSource —33.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
HLESource 58.7%—Not comparable
FrontierScienceSource 36.7%—Not comparable
FrontierScience ResearchSource 36.7%—Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.7%—Not comparable
MMLUSource —87.2%Not comparable
MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source —75.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource —63.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —24.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —75.2%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —14.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —-44.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —22.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —86.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
IPhO 2025 (Theory)Source 93.5%—Not comparable
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 50%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 50.000%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 37.500%—Not comparable
AIME25 (Arcee)Source —24.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
MMMU-ProSource 94%—Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1165Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-IFBenchSource —56.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.4 Pro and Trinity-Large-Preview on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.4 Pro and Trinity-Large-Preview today?

GPT-5.4 Pro: $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens Trinity-Large-Preview: $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

OpenAI Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.