Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GPT-5.4
89
MiMo-V2-Flash
59
Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 #16 · MiMo-V2-Flash unranked
Pick GPT-5.4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Coding
+15.7 difference
Knowledge
+18.4 difference
GPT-5.4
MiMo-V2-Flash
$2.5 / $15
$0 / $0
74 t/s
129 t/s
151.79s
2.14s
1.05M
256K
Pick GPT-5.4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
GPT-5.4 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 89 to 59. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.4 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for MiMo-V2-Flash. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 256K for MiMo-V2-Flash.
GPT-5.4 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 89 to 59. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 92.8% and 83.7%.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.5 versus 66.1. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.4 versus 57.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.