Skip to main content

GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.5 397B

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.4

93

VS

Qwen3.5 397B

66

3 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 #4 · Qwen3.5 397B #10

Pick GPT-5.4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GPT-5.4
77vs56.2

+20.8 difference

Coding

Qwen3.5 397B
57.7vs60.3

+2.6 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.4
92.8vs65.2

+27.6 difference

Multimodal

GPT-5.4
81.2vs79

+2.2 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.4

Qwen3.5 397B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$2.5 / $15

$0 / $0

Speed

74 t/s

96 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

151.79s

2.44s

Context Window

1.05M

128K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.4 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.4's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.8 against 65.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 75.1% to 52.5%. Qwen3.5 397B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.4 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5 397B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Qwen3.5 397B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.4 gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, GPT-5.4 or Qwen3.5 397B?

GPT-5.4 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 75.1% and 52.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.4 or Qwen3.5 397B?

GPT-5.4 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.8 versus 65.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.4 or Qwen3.5 397B?

Qwen3.5 397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60.3 versus 57.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.4 or Qwen3.5 397B?

GPT-5.4 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77 versus 56.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.4 or Qwen3.5 397B?

GPT-5.4 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.2 versus 79. Inside this category, ScreenSpot Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.