Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Holo3-122B-A10B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.5 Pro #38 (Estimated); Holo3-122B-A10B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-5.5 Pro and Holo3-122B-A10B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to GPT-5.5 Pro; 1 to Holo3-122B-A10B.
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- GPT-5.5 Pro only
- 7
- Holo3-122B-A10B only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. GPT-5.5 Pro makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window; Holo3-122B-A10B is the better fit if you want the cheaper token bill or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
GPT-5.5 Pro and Holo3-122B-A10B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
GPT-5.5 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.40 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3-122B-A10B. That is roughly 60.0x on output cost alone. GPT-5.5 Pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while Holo3-122B-A10B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.5 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 64K for Holo3-122B-A10B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 Pro | Holo3-122B-A10B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-5.5 Pro$30 input / $180 output | Holo3-122B-A10B$0.4 input / $3 output | Holo3-122B-A10B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-5.5 ProNot available | Holo3-122B-A10BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-5.5 ProNot available | Holo3-122B-A10BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-5.5 Pro1M | Holo3-122B-A10B64K | GPT-5.5 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticGPT-5.5 Pro wins2 benchmarks
Reasoning1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Holo3-122B-A10B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| CritPtSource | 30.6% | — | Not comparable |
Knowledge2 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, GPT-5.5 Pro or Holo3-122B-A10B?
GPT-5.5 Pro and Holo3-122B-A10B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.5 Pro or Holo3-122B-A10B?
GPT-5.5 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 90.1 versus 78.9. Holo3-122B-A10B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.