Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Inkling

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

63.44/100
Margin
5.6pts
winning →
Thinking Machines Lab
69/100
2 category wins1 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.5 Pro unranked; Inkling #17

BenchAlign evidence: GPT-5.5 Pro estimated; Inkling not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.5 Pro and Inkling share 3 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to GPT-5.5 Pro; 13 to Inkling.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
3
GPT-5.5 Pro only
4
Inkling only
13
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Pick GPT-5.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Inkling only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.5 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 75 to 69. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.5 Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 90.1 against 69.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is BrowseComp, 90.1% to 77.1%. Inkling does hit back in mathematics, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.5 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens for Inkling. That is roughly 38.5x on output cost alone. GPT-5.5 Pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while Inkling is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.5 Pro and Inkling
CategoryGPT-5.5 ProΔInkling
MathGPT-5.5 Pro48.1Margin 49.0Inkling97.1
AgenticGPT-5.5 Pro90.1Margin 20.7Inkling69.4
KnowledgeGPT-5.5 Pro57.2Margin 5.5Inkling51.7
CodingGPT-5.5 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapInkling68.6
MultimodalGPT-5.5 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapInkling76.5
Inst. FollowingGPT-5.5 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapInkling79.8

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GPT-5.5 ProB · Inkling
  1. BrowseComp

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 90.1%B 77.1%
    Winner: GPT-5.5 ProΔ 13
    BrowseComp: GPT-5.5 Pro scored 90.1%; Inkling scored 77.1%. GPT-5.5 Pro wins this benchmark.
  2. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 57.2%B 46%
    Winner: GPT-5.5 ProΔ 11.2
    HLE: GPT-5.5 Pro scored 57.2%; Inkling scored 46%. GPT-5.5 Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.5 ProInklingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.5 Pro$30 input / $180 outputInkling$1.87 input / $4.68 outputInkling has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.5 ProNot availableInklingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.5 ProNot availableInklingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.5 Pro1MInkling1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGPT-5.5 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProInklingResult
BrowseCompSource 90.1%77.1%GPT-5.5 Pro leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.1%Not comparable
Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource 1258Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProInklingResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 54.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProInklingResult
CritPtSource 30.6%Not comparable
KnowledgeGPT-5.5 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProInklingResult
HLESource 57.2%46%GPT-5.5 Pro leads
HLE w/o toolsSource 43.1%30%GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPQASource 87.9%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.9%Not comparable
MathInkling wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProInklingResult
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 52.4%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 51.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 39.600%Not comparable
AIME26Source 97.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProInklingResult
MMMU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 78.1%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProInklingResult
IFBenchSource 79.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.5 Pro or Inkling?

GPT-5.5 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 75 to 69. The biggest single separator in this matchup is BrowseComp, where the scores are 90.1% and 77.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.5 Pro or Inkling?

GPT-5.5 Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 57.2 versus 51.7. Inside this category, HLE w/o tools is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GPT-5.5 Pro or Inkling?

Inkling has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 97.1 versus 48.1. GPT-5.5 Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.5 Pro or Inkling?

GPT-5.5 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 90.1 versus 69.4. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.