Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs MAI-Thinking-1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
63.69/100
No comparison
N/A
1 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.5 Pro #38 (Estimated); MAI-Thinking-1 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.5 Pro and MAI-Thinking-1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to GPT-5.5 Pro; 13 to MAI-Thinking-1.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-5.5 Pro only
7
MAI-Thinking-1 only
13
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. GPT-5.5 Pro makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window; MAI-Thinking-1 is the better fit if mathematics is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.5 Pro and MAI-Thinking-1 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

GPT-5.5 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.5 ProMAI-Thinking-1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.5 Pro$30 input / $180 outputMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.5 ProNot availableMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.5 ProNot availableMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.5 Pro1MMAI-Thinking-1256KGPT-5.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGPT-5.5 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMAI-Thinking-1Result
BrowseCompSource 90.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMAI-Thinking-1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMAI-Thinking-1Result
CritPtSource 30.6%Not comparable
Graphwalks BFS 128KSource 90%Not comparable
KnowledgeMAI-Thinking-1 wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMAI-Thinking-1Result
HLESource 57.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 43.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 84.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 84.2%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 85%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 31%Not comparable
MathMAI-Thinking-1 wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMAI-Thinking-1Result
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 52.4%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 51.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 39.600%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 97%Not comparable
AIME26Source 94.5%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 84.9%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMAI-Thinking-1Result
IFBenchSource 85%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.5 Pro or MAI-Thinking-1?

GPT-5.5 Pro and MAI-Thinking-1 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.5 Pro or MAI-Thinking-1?

MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 72.5 versus 57.2. GPT-5.5 Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for math, GPT-5.5 Pro or MAI-Thinking-1?

MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 89.7 versus 48.1. GPT-5.5 Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.5 Pro or MAI-Thinking-1?

GPT-5.5 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 90.1 versus 46. MAI-Thinking-1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.