Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GPT-5.5
89
Holo3-122B-A10B
78
Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.5 #2 · Holo3-122B-A10B unranked
Pick GPT-5.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Holo3-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Agentic
+2.9 difference
GPT-5.5
Holo3-122B-A10B
$5 / $30
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
64K
Pick GPT-5.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Holo3-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
GPT-5.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 89 to 78. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 81.8 against 78.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 78.7% to 78.8%.
GPT-5.5 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Holo3-122B-A10B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 64K for Holo3-122B-A10B.
GPT-5.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 89 to 78. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 78.7% and 78.8%.
GPT-5.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 78.9. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.