Model comparison
GPT-OSS 120B vs MiniMax M3
Head-to-head evidence from 20 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-OSS 120B unranked; MiniMax M3 #18
BenchAlign evidence: GPT-OSS 120B supported; MiniMax M3 supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-OSS 120B and MiniMax M3 share 20 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to GPT-OSS 120B; 25 to MiniMax M3.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 20
- GPT-OSS 120B only
- 8
- MiniMax M3 only
- 25
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GPT-OSS 120B and MiniMax M3 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 20 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
MiniMax M3 is priced at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-OSS 120B. MiniMax M3 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for GPT-OSS 120B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GPT-OSS 120B | Δ | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | GPT-OSS 120BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M372.3 |
| Coding | GPT-OSS 120BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M372.2 |
| Math | GPT-OSS 120BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M385.7 |
| Multimodal | GPT-OSS 120BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M364.9 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-OSS 120B | MiniMax M3 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-OSS 120B$0 input / $0 output | MiniMax M3$0.3 input / $1.2 output | GPT-OSS 120B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-OSS 120B262 tok/s | MiniMax M3Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-OSS 120B0.79 s | MiniMax M3Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-OSS 120B128K | MiniMax M31M | MiniMax M3 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic19 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-OSS 120B | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 13.2% | 35.4% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 3.1% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 65.8% | 88.9% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 15.0% | 44.7% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 799 | 1395 | MiniMax M3 leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 29.61% | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 25.5% | 32.1% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 0.0% | 6.7% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA ITBenchSource | 5.6% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 66% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 83.5% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | — | 70.1% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 74.2% | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 74.5% | Not comparable |
| GDPval rubricsSource | — | 74.7% | Not comparable |
| BankerToolBenchSource | — | 76.1% | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | — | 19.8% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | — | 4.6% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 1110 | Not comparable |
Coding13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-OSS 120B | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| React Native EvalsSource | 71.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 30.4% | 58.6% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 23.5% | 42.4% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 38.9% | 45.4% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA LiveCodeBenchSource | 87.8% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 80.5% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 59% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 66.0% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 42.1% | Not comparable |
| VIBE V2Source | — | 50.1% | Not comparable |
| SVG-BenchSource | — | 63.7% | Not comparable |
| KernelBench HardSource | — | 28.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source | — | 65.2% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-OSS 120B | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 23.8% | 44.4% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 78.2% | 92.9% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 18.5% | 37.1% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -50.0% | 1.4% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 21.5% | 15.0% | GPT-OSS 120B leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 91.2% | 16.1% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA Openness IndexSource | 38.9% | 33.3% | GPT-OSS 120B leads |
| AA MMLU-ProSource | 80.8% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-OSS 120B | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource | 82.8% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-OSS 120B | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1002 | 1294 | MiniMax M3 leads |
| OfficeQA ProSource | — | 45.1% | Not comparable |
| OmniDocBench 1.5Source | — | 91.6% | Not comparable |
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 78.1% | Not comparable |
| VideoMMMUSource | — | 84.6% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (with subtitle)Source | — | 85.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 78.6% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-OSS 120B | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 69.0% | 82.9% | MiniMax M3 leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GPT-OSS 120B and MiniMax M3 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GPT-OSS 120B and MiniMax M3 today?
GPT-OSS 120B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens MiniMax M3: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.