Model comparison
GPT-OSS 20B vs MiniMax M1 80k
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-OSS 20B #159 (Supported); MiniMax M1 80k #190 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-OSS 20B and MiniMax M1 80k share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 18 results are unique to GPT-OSS 20B; 0 to MiniMax M1 80k.
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- GPT-OSS 20B only
- 18
- MiniMax M1 80k only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GPT-OSS 20B and MiniMax M1 80k is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for MiniMax M1 80k yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
GPT-OSS 20B has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 80K for MiniMax M1 80k.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-OSS 20B | MiniMax M1 80k | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-OSS 20B$0 input / $0 output | MiniMax M1 80kNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-OSS 20B313 tok/s | MiniMax M1 80kNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-OSS 20B0.65 s | MiniMax M1 80kNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-OSS 20B128K | MiniMax M1 80k80K | GPT-OSS 20B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic5 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-OSS 20B | MiniMax M1 80k | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 14.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 68.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 9.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -63.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 15.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 94.1% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-OSS 20B | MiniMax M1 80k | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 882 | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-OSS 20B | MiniMax M1 80k | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 65.1% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GPT-OSS 20B and MiniMax M1 80k on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GPT-OSS 20B and MiniMax M1 80k today?
GPT-OSS 20B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens MiniMax M1 80k: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.