Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Data as of October 17, 2026 · How the score is built

EstablishedProprietaryNon-Reasoning

Released Jun 16, 202580K context

MiniMax M1 80k

Decision readingMiniMax M1 80k scores 27.6 out of 100 and ranks #202 of 224. This profile shows 6 source-displayable benchmark rows. No comparable first-party API price is published in the catalog.

Released Jun 16, 2025 — see all recent releases

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

27.6/100

field median 49.6#202 of 224 ranked models

Public

#202of 224

Verified —

Price

API rate not published

input median $0.75No comparable first-party hosted token rate

Speed

71tok/s

field median 92 tok/sFirst token 29.98 s

Context

80Ktokens

field median 256,000Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

Strongest published evidence

Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.

Validate before choosing

6 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.

Source-linked · 6 displayable benchmark rows

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
CodingRank Not rankedWeight 20%2 benchmarksVerified
43.8
ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%1 benchmarkVerified
68.9
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MathWeight 5%3 benchmarksVerified
Score pending

6 of 681 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100

Coverage details

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. AgenticNot measured
  2. Coding2/2 verified
  3. Reasoning1/1 verified
  4. MultimodalNot measured
  5. KnowledgeNot measured
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Inst. FollowingNot measured
  8. Math3/3 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding2 rows
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark VerifiedScore56%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96%

Gap40 behindWeightDisplay only
LiveCodeBenchLiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for CodeScore65%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Solar Pro 4 · 87.8%

Gap22.8 behindWeightDisplay only
Reasoning1 row
Reasoning benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
LongBench v2Score61.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Beam 1.0 501B-A23B FP8 · 67.6%

Gap6.1 behindWeightWeighted 25%
Math3 rows
Math benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
AIME 2024American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024Score86%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-OSS 120B · 95.8%

Gap9.8 behindWeightDisplay only
AIME 2025American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025Score76.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.2 · 100%

Gap23.1 behindWeightDisplay only
MATH-500MATH-500 Problem SetScore96.8%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B · 98.8%

Gap2 behindWeightDisplay only

Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value

All 6 rows

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Jun 16, 2025 · you are here

    MiniMax M1 80k

    Score 27.6 · Price not listed

Base entry

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
80K
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing record
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

MiniMax M1 80k ranks #202 of 224 on the public leaderboard with a score of 27.58/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.

MiniMax M1 80k is a proprietary model with a 80K context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.

6 of 681 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Last updated October 17, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Questions

How does MiniMax M1 80k perform overall in AI benchmarks?

MiniMax M1 80k ranks #202 out of 224 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 27.58/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 6 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Is MiniMax M1 80k good for coding and programming?

MiniMax M1 80k has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is MiniMax M1 80k good for mathematics?

MiniMax M1 80k has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is MiniMax M1 80k good for reasoning and logic?

MiniMax M1 80k has source-displayable benchmark coverage for reasoning and logic, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Does MiniMax M1 80k have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. MiniMax M1 80k currently has 6 source-displayable rows across 681 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of MiniMax M1 80k?

MiniMax M1 80k has a reported context window of 80K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Watch MiniMax M1 80k in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

Compare MiniMax M1 80k with every tracked model953 comparisons