Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 3 [Beta] vs Grok Code Fast 1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
40.43/100
Margin
1.8pts
← winning
38.64/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 3 [Beta] #171 (Supported); Grok Code Fast 1 #180 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 3 [Beta] and Grok Code Fast 1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Grok 3 [Beta]; 12 to Grok Code Fast 1.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
0
Grok 3 [Beta] only
2
Grok Code Fast 1 only
12
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 3 [Beta] and Grok Code Fast 1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok Code Fast 1 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Grok 3 [Beta].

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 3 [Beta]Grok Code Fast 1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableGrok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableGrok Code Fast 1172 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableGrok Code Fast 12.81 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 3 [Beta]128KGrok Code Fast 1256KGrok Code Fast 1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]Grok Code Fast 1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 75.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]Grok Code Fast 1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 70.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 36.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]Grok Code Fast 1Result
AA-LCRSource 48.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]Grok Code Fast 1Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 21.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 72.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 7.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -36.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 23.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.5%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]Grok Code Fast 1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 3.793%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]Grok Code Fast 1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 41.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 3 [Beta] and Grok Code Fast 1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 3 [Beta] and Grok Code Fast 1 today?

Grok 3 [Beta]: Pricing unavailable Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.