Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Nemotron 3 Super 100B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
51.25/100
Margin
1.2pts
← winning
50.08/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4.1 Fast #107 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Super 100B #117 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4.1 Fast and Nemotron 3 Super 100B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to Grok 4.1 Fast; 1 to Nemotron 3 Super 100B.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Grok 4.1 Fast only
13
Nemotron 3 Super 100B only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4.1 Fast and Nemotron 3 Super 100B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4.1 Fast is priced at $0.20 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Super 100B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4.1 FastNemotron 3 Super 100BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4.1 Fast$0.2 input / $0.5 outputNemotron 3 Super 100B$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Super 100B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 4.1 Fast138 tok/sNemotron 3 Super 100B367 tok/sNemotron 3 Super 100B has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 4.1 Fast0.54 sNemotron 3 Super 100B0.71 sGrok 4.1 Fast reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4.1 Fast1MNemotron 3 Super 100B1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastNemotron 3 Super 100BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 63.7%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 47.32%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 5.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastNemotron 3 Super 100BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 29.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastNemotron 3 Super 100BResult
AA-LCRSource 22.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastNemotron 3 Super 100BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 16.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 63.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 5.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -50.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastNemotron 3 Super 100BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 48.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastNemotron 3 Super 100BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 36.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4.1 Fast and Nemotron 3 Super 100B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4.1 Fast and Nemotron 3 Super 100B today?

Grok 4.1 Fast: $0.20 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Super 100B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.