Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Grok 4.3
76
Qwen3.7 Max
93
Verified leaderboard positions: Grok 4.3 unranked · Qwen3.7 Max #2
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4.3 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Coding
+26.3 difference
Knowledge
+17.3 difference
Inst. Following
+7.7 difference
Grok 4.3
Qwen3.7 Max
$1.25 / $2.5
$null / $null
209 t/s
N/A
12.36s
N/A
1M
1M
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4.3 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Qwen3.7 Max is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 76. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.7 Max's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 73.6 against 47.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 35% to 41.4%.
Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 76. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 35% and 41.4%.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.2 versus 53.9. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.6 versus 47.3. Inside this category, SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 89 versus 81.3. Inside this category, IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.