Grok 4.5 vs Holo3-122B-A10B
Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
Grok 4.5 leads for most workloads.
- Holo3-122B-A10B is ~5× cheaper on input tokens — the budget pick.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Grok 4.5
75
Holo3-122B-A10B
72
Pick Grok 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Holo3-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Δ | Holo3-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 83.3 | ← 4.4 | 78.9 |
| Coding | 64.7 | — | — |
Operational Comparison
Grok 4.5
Holo3-122B-A10B
$2 / $6
$0.4 / $3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
500K
64K
Quick Verdict
Pick Grok 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Holo3-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Grok 4.5 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 75 versus 72. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Grok 4.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 83.3 against 78.9.
Grok 4.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.40 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3-122B-A10B. That is roughly 2.0x on output cost alone. Grok 4.5 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Holo3-122B-A10B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Grok 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 500K, compared with 64K for Holo3-122B-A10B.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Grok 4.5 or Holo3-122B-A10B?
Grok 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 75 to 72.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Grok 4.5 or Holo3-122B-A10B?
Grok 4.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.3 versus 78.9. Holo3-122B-A10B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.