Grok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
Grok 4.5 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Grok 4.5
75
MiMo-V2-Pro
73
Pick Grok 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Pro only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Δ | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 64.7 | → 13.3 | 78.0 |
| Agentic | 83.3 | — | — |
Operational Comparison
Grok 4.5
MiMo-V2-Pro
$2 / $6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
500K
1M
Quick Verdict
Pick Grok 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Pro only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Grok 4.5 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 75 versus 73. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
MiMo-V2-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 500K for Grok 4.5.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Grok 4.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro?
Grok 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 75 to 73.
Which is better for coding, Grok 4.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 78 versus 64.7. Grok 4.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.