Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Qwen3 235B 2507

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
60.42/100
Margin
4.4pts
← winning
56.02/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4 #50 (Supported); Qwen3 235B 2507 #78 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4 and Qwen3 235B 2507 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Grok 4; 4 to Qwen3 235B 2507.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Grok 4 only
16
Qwen3 235B 2507 only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4 and Qwen3 235B 2507 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4Qwen3 235B 2507Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4Not availableQwen3 235B 2507$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 454 tok/sQwen3 235B 2507Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 415.60 sQwen3 235B 2507Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4128KQwen3 235B 2507128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3 235B 2507Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 74.9%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 42.34%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3 235B 2507Result
React Native EvalsSource 72.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 45.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3 235B 2507Result
AA-LCRSource 68.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 2.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3 235B 2507Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 23.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 3.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 41.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 64.2%Not comparable
GPQASource 77.5%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 62.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 83%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3 235B 2507Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 19.655%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3 235B 2507Result
MMLU-ProXSource 79.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3 235B 2507Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 68.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3 235B 2507Result
AA-IFBenchSource 53.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4 and Qwen3 235B 2507 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4 and Qwen3 235B 2507 today?

Grok 4: Pricing unavailable Qwen3 235B 2507: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.