Model comparison
Grok 4 vs Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4 #50 (Supported); Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) #66 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Grok 4 and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 14 results are unique to Grok 4; 0 to Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).
Updated July 20, 2026- Shared results
- 2
- Grok 4 only
- 14
- Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Grok 4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Grok 4 has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 60.42 versus 58.01. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Grok 4's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 15.3 against 6.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), 19.655% to 8.481%.
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Grok 4 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Grok 4 | Δ | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Math | Grok 415.3 | Margin← 8.9 | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)6.4 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)
MathA 19.655%B 8.481%Winner: Grok 4Δ 11.2FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): Grok 4 scored 19.655%; Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) scored 8.481%. Grok 4 wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)
MathA 2.083%B 0.000%Winner: Grok 4Δ 2.1FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4): Grok 4 scored 2.083%; Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) scored 0.000%. Grok 4 wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Grok 4 | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Grok 4Not available | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Grok 454 tok/s | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Grok 415.60 s | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Grok 4128K | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)128K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic2 benchmarks
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 33.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 87.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 23.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 3.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 41.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 64.2% | — | Not comparable |
MathGrok 4 wins2 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 68.8% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 53.7% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Grok 4 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?
Grok 4 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 60.42 to 58.01. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), where the scores are 19.655% and 8.481%.
Which is better for math, Grok 4 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?
Grok 4 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 15.3 versus 6.4. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.