Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Laguna XS.2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

37.75/100
No comparison
Poolside
N/A
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok Code Fast 1 #189 (Supported); Laguna XS.2 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok Code Fast 1 and Laguna XS.2 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Grok Code Fast 1; 4 to Laguna XS.2.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
1
Grok Code Fast 1 only
11
Laguna XS.2 only
4
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Grok Code Fast 1 makes more sense if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; Laguna XS.2 is the better fit if you want the cheaper token bill or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Grok Code Fast 1 and Laguna XS.2 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Grok Code Fast 1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Laguna XS.2. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Laguna XS.2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Grok Code Fast 1 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok Code Fast 1 and Laguna XS.2
CategoryGrok Code Fast 1ΔLaguna XS.2
CodingGrok Code Fast 170.8Margin 10.0Laguna XS.260.8
AgenticGrok Code Fast 1Not measuredMarginNo overlapLaguna XS.235.7

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Grok Code Fast 1B · Laguna XS.2
  1. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 70.8%B 69.9%
    Winner: Grok Code Fast 1Δ 0.9
    SWE-bench Verified: Grok Code Fast 1 scored 70.8%; Laguna XS.2 scored 69.9%. Grok Code Fast 1 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok Code Fast 1Laguna XS.2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 outputLaguna XS.2$0 input / $0 outputLaguna XS.2 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok Code Fast 1172 tok/sLaguna XS.2Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok Code Fast 12.81 sLaguna XS.2Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok Code Fast 1256KLaguna XS.2256KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Laguna XS.2Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 75.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 35.7%Not comparable
CodingGrok Code Fast 1 wins
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Laguna XS.2Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 70.8%69.9%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 36.2%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 57.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 46.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 35.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Laguna XS.2Result
AA-LCRSource 48.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Laguna XS.2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 21.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 72.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 7.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -36.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 23.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Laguna XS.2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 41.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Grok Code Fast 1 or Laguna XS.2?

Grok Code Fast 1 and Laguna XS.2 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for coding, Grok Code Fast 1 or Laguna XS.2?

Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.8 versus 60.8. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.