Model comparison
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Grok Code Fast 1 #180 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Super 100B #117 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Grok Code Fast 1 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Grok Code Fast 1; 1 to Nemotron 3 Super 100B.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Grok Code Fast 1 only
- 12
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Grok Code Fast 1 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Grok Code Fast 1 is priced at $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Super 100B. Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Grok Code Fast 1.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Grok Code Fast 1 | Nemotron 3 Super 100B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Grok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 output | Nemotron 3 Super 100B$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Grok Code Fast 1172 tok/s | Nemotron 3 Super 100B367 tok/s | Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Grok Code Fast 12.81 s | Nemotron 3 Super 100B0.71 s | Nemotron 3 Super 100B reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Grok Code Fast 1256K | Nemotron 3 Super 100B1M | Nemotron 3 Super 100B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic2 benchmarks
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok Code Fast 1 | Nemotron 3 Super 100B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 21.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 72.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 7.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -36.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 23.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 78.5% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok Code Fast 1 | Nemotron 3 Super 100B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 41.4% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Grok Code Fast 1 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Grok Code Fast 1 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B today?
Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Super 100B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.