Model comparison
Holo3.1-35B-A3B vs Inkling
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Holo3.1-35B-A3B unranked (Not scored); Inkling #20 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Holo3.1-35B-A3B and Inkling share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Holo3.1-35B-A3B; 32 to Inkling.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Holo3.1-35B-A3B only
- 1
- Inkling only
- 32
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Holo3.1-35B-A3B and Inkling is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Inkling is priced at $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $1.80 output per 1M tokens for Holo3.1-35B-A3B. Inkling has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Holo3.1-35B-A3B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Holo3.1-35B-A3B | Inkling | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Holo3.1-35B-A3B$0.25 input / $1.8 output | Inkling$1.87 input / $4.68 output | Holo3.1-35B-A3B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Holo3.1-35B-A3BNot available | InklingNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Holo3.1-35B-A3BNot available | InklingNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Holo3.1-35B-A3B262K | Inkling1M | Inkling lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-35B-A3B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AndroidWorldSource | 79.3% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 63.8% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 77.1% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 74.1% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource | — | 1257 | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 32.3% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 36.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1239 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 836 | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 23.7% | Not comparable |
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-35B-A3B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | — | 87.9% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.9% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 46% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 30% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 40.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 87.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 29.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 2.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 40.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 63.1% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-35B-A3B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26Source | — | 97.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-35B-A3B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBenchSource | — | 79.8% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Holo3.1-35B-A3B and Inkling on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Holo3.1-35B-A3B and Inkling today?
Holo3.1-35B-A3B: $0.25 input / $1.80 output per 1M tokens Inkling: $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.