Model comparison
Holo3.1-9B vs Mistral Medium 3
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Holo3.1-9B unranked (Not scored); Mistral Medium 3 #156 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Holo3.1-9B and Mistral Medium 3 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Holo3.1-9B; 13 to Mistral Medium 3.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Holo3.1-9B only
- 1
- Mistral Medium 3 only
- 13
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Holo3.1-9B and Mistral Medium 3 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Mistral Medium 3 is priced at $0.40 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3.1-9B. Holo3.1-9B has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for Mistral Medium 3.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Holo3.1-9B | Mistral Medium 3 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Holo3.1-9B$0 input / $0 output | Mistral Medium 3$0.4 input / $2 output | Holo3.1-9B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Holo3.1-9BNot available | Mistral Medium 357 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Holo3.1-9BNot available | Mistral Medium 31.20 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Holo3.1-9B262K | Mistral Medium 3128K | Holo3.1-9B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic2 benchmarks
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-9B | Mistral Medium 3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 33.1% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-9B | Mistral Medium 3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 12.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 57.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 4.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -31.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 18.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 60.9% | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-9B | Mistral Medium 3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 39.3% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Holo3.1-9B and Mistral Medium 3 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Holo3.1-9B and Mistral Medium 3 today?
Holo3.1-9B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Medium 3: $0.40 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.