Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Holo3-122B-A10B
100
MiniMax M3
76
Verified leaderboard positions: Holo3-122B-A10B unranked · MiniMax M3 #12
Pick Holo3-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M3 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window.
Agentic
+7.0 difference
Holo3-122B-A10B
MiniMax M3
$null / $null
$0.3 / $1.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
64K
1M
Pick Holo3-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M3 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window.
Holo3-122B-A10B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 100 to 76. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Holo3-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 78.9 against 71.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 78.8% to 70.1%.
MiniMax M3 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 64K for Holo3-122B-A10B.
Holo3-122B-A10B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 76. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 78.8% and 70.1%.
Holo3-122B-A10B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.9 versus 71.9. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.