Skip to main content

Model comparison

Hy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bit vs MAI-Thinking-1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Tencent Hunyuan
N/A
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Hy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bit and MAI-Thinking-1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Hy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bit; 13 to MAI-Thinking-1.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Hy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bit only
0
MAI-Thinking-1 only
13
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Hy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bit and MAI-Thinking-1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Hy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bit yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Hy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bit has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bitMAI-Thinking-1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bitNot availableMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bitNot availableMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bitNot availableMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bit262KMAI-Thinking-1256KHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bit lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bitMAI-Thinking-1Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bitMAI-Thinking-1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bitMAI-Thinking-1Result
Graphwalks BFS 128KSource 90%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bitMAI-Thinking-1Result
GPQASource 84.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 84.2%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 85%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 31%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bitMAI-Thinking-1Result
AIME 2025Source 97%Not comparable
AIME26Source 94.5%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 84.9%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkHy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bitMAI-Thinking-1Result
IFBenchSource 85%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare Hy-MT1.5-1.8B-1.25bit and MAI-Thinking-1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.