Model comparison
Hy3 Preview vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct
Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Hy3 Preview and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct share 2 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 20 results are unique to Hy3 Preview; 4 to Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 2
- Hy3 Preview only
- 20
- Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only
- 4
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only becomes the better choice if instruction following is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Hy3 Preview is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 53 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Hy3 Preview is the reasoning model in the pair, while Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Hy3 Preview gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Hy3 Preview | Δ | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inst. Following | Hy3 Preview63.1 | Margin→ 12.7 | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct75.8 |
| Knowledge | Hy3 Preview33.8 | Margin→ 7.1 | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct40.9 |
| Agentic | Hy3 Preview54.4 | MarginNo overlap | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measured |
| Coding | Hy3 Preview57.8 | MarginNo overlap | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 87.2%B 40.9%Winner: Hy3 PreviewΔ 46.3GPQA: Hy3 Preview scored 87.2%; Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct scored 40.9%. Hy3 Preview wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Hy3 Preview | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Hy3 Preview$0 input / $0 output | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Hy3 PreviewNot available | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Hy3 PreviewNot available | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Hy3 Preview256K | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct128K | Hy3 Preview lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic6 benchmarks
Coding6 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
KnowledgeMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct wins10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Hy3 Preview | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 41.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | 87.2% | 40.9% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| GPQA-DSource | 87.2% | 40.9% | Hy3 Preview leads |
| HLESource | 25.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 31.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 73.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 89.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 31.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -18.5% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ReduxSource | — | 78.1% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, Hy3 Preview or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?
Hy3 Preview is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 53 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 87.2% and 40.9%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Hy3 Preview or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 40.9 versus 33.8. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for instruction following, Hy3 Preview or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 75.8 versus 63.1. Hy3 Preview stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.