Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Hy3 Preview
58
Ornith-1.0-397B
96
Pick Ornith-1.0-397B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Hy3 Preview only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+23.1 difference
Coding
+22.4 difference
Hy3 Preview
Ornith-1.0-397B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
262K
Pick Ornith-1.0-397B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Hy3 Preview only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Ornith-1.0-397B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 96 to 58. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Ornith-1.0-397B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 77.5 against 54.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 54.4% to 77.5%.
Ornith-1.0-397B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Hy3 Preview.
Ornith-1.0-397B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 96 to 58. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 54.4% and 77.5%.
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 82.4 versus 60. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 54.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.