Skip to main content
Radar

Provider changes are easy to miss. Radar watches releases, pricing, deprecations, and incidents at the source.Provider changes are easy to miss.

See Radar
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Hy3 Preview vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Updated August 7, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.

Hy3 Preview

Tencent

42.8/100

Estimated · Public rank #167

90% interval 32.9–52.7

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Alibaba

59.5/100

Supported · Public rank #55

90% interval 48.9–70.2

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the higher public score estimate, 59.55 versus 42.8, but the 90% score intervals overlap. Treat that as a lead, not a settled winner.

3 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    Hy3 Preview

    Hy3 Preview leads on the same 1 weighted benchmark row.

    Confidence: limited

  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the larger documented context window.

    Confidence: documented

Show secondary and unsupported calls

  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    Not enough matched evidence

    The category averages use different weighted benchmark sets, so they are directional rather than like-for-like.

    Confidence: limited

  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

Shared results
3
Hy3 Preview only
3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only
12
Like-for-like categories
1 / 8

2 categories use different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.

Coding

Like-for-like
Hy3 Preview
74.4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
72.0
Weighted basis
1 vs 1 rows
Reading
Hy3 Preview leads

Agentic

Directional only
Hy3 Preview
54.4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
56.4
Weighted basis
1 vs 3 rows
Reading
Directional only

Knowledge

Directional only
Hy3 Preview
87.2
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
83.6
Weighted basis
1 vs 3 rows
Reading
Directional only

Reasoning

Not comparable
Hy3 Preview
Not measured
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
60.2
Weighted basis
0 vs 1 rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
Hy3 Preview
Not measured
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Not measured
Weighted basis
0 vs 0 rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
Hy3 Preview
Not measured
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
82.2
Weighted basis
0 vs 1 rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable
Hy3 Preview
Not measured
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
77.2
Weighted basis
0 vs 1 rows
Reading
Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable
Hy3 Preview
Not measured
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
93.4
Weighted basis
0 vs 1 rows
Reading
Not comparable

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Hy3 Preview
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request

Hy3 Preview has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Hy3 Preview
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request

Hy3 Preview has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Hy3 Preview
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable

Hy3 Preview has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has no comparable published API token rate.

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

Context window

Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.

Hy3 Preview

256K

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

262K

API model ID

Hy3 Preview

Not sourced

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Not sourced

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

Hy3 Preview

No comparable hosted API rate

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

No comparable hosted API rate

Documented inputs

Hy3 Preview

Not sourced

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Not sourced

Documented outputs

Hy3 Preview

Not sourced

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Not sourced

Provider availability

Hy3 Preview

Not sourced

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

Hy3 Preview

Reasoning

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Reasoning

Weight access

Hy3 Preview

Open Weight

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Open Weight

License

Hy3 Preview

Open Weight

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Open Weight

Release date

Hy3 Preview

2026-04-23

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

2026-03-04

If you already use one of these models
Deployment change
The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the higher public score estimate, 59.55 versus 42.8, but the 90% score intervals overlap.
Workload cost
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the larger documented window (262K).

Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence18 rows

Agentic

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Hy3 Preview54.4%
    Source
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B49.4%
    Source

    Hy3 Preview leads this result

  • Gert Labs

    Hy3 Preview36.91%
    Source
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B—

    Not directly comparable

  • BrowseComp

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B63.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • OSWorld-Verified

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B58%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Coding

  • SWE-bench Verified

    Hy3 Preview74.4%
    Source
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B72%
    Source

    Hy3 Preview leads this result

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Hy3 Preview54.4%
    Source
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B—

    Not directly comparable

Reasoning

  • LongBench v2

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B60.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Knowledge

  • GPQA

    Hy3 Preview87.2%
    Source
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B86.6%
    Source

    Hy3 Preview leads this result

  • GPQA-D

    Hy3 Preview87.2%
    Source
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B—

    Not directly comparable

  • MMLU-Pro

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B86.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • SuperGPQA

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B67.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Multilingual

  • MMLU-ProX

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B82.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Multimodal

  • MMMU

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B83.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MMVU

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B74.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MathVision

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B86.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • CharXiv

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B77.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • V*

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B93.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Instruction following

  • IFEval

    Hy3 Preview—
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B93.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the higher public score estimate, 59.55 versus 42.8, but the 90% score intervals overlap. The higher estimate is not a decisive winner because the uncertainty ranges overlap.

Which is better for coding, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Hy3 Preview leads the like-for-like coding comparison across 1 shared weighted benchmark row.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

The current agentic tasks averages use different weighted benchmark sets, so BenchLM does not name a winner from them. Read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.

Which costs less, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the larger documented context window: 262K, compared with 256K.

Related comparisons

Compare API pricing Read the methodology Open the model selector

Last updated August 7, 2026

Watch Hy3 Preview vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.